not understand the claim, in reality.
There would be the case like we can make judgment although we have never heard of it or simply don't care about it. An argument, which assumes that someone who does not believe a proposition is the same that someone believes its negation, commits a version of the epistemic fallacy.
A belief of being true is a matter of its fitting the facts, not a
크립키, 『명명과 필연』, 제3강연
● 세가지 구분
(1) 선험성(a priority)과 필연성(necessity)의 구분
(2) 고정지시어(rigid designator)와 비고정지시어(non-rigid designator)의 구분
(3) 의미를 주는 것(giving the meaning)와 지시체를 결정하는 것(fixing the reference)의 구분
● 대상, 본질, 동일성 (pp.110~114)
- 대상이 갖고